When a non-virtuous action is legal…

I am a charity trustee of Maitreya Centre, and have now been accused, by the tradition that the centre is supposed to belong to, of acting illegally and unconstitutionally. Now I am not a legal or constitutional expert, but I know that the Dharma that Buddha taught was based on compassion and lovingkindness and when I see actions taken by so-called guardians of a Buddhist tradition that are clearly and unmistakenly non-virtuous in nature because they harm others, especially harming their access to dharma study and practice, then I know those actions must be opposed even though they are supposedly legal and constitutionally valid.

Many harmful actions in this world are perfectly legal, but that does not make them right. Tell the heroes of the Arab Spring that their actions are illegal and unconstitutional and listen to their defiant roar back. Tell the Occupy London Stock Exchange protesters that their actions are illegal, and their shout of outrage roars in defiance across the world. The first black woman to sit at the front of the bus in Alabama was engaging in a highly illegal act, but that act was the start of a civil rights movement that brought real freedoms to millions. So many times in so many places and for so many different reasons, legality and constitutionality has to be challenged if people are to be able to live in peace and freedom, with dignity and respect.

A Buddhist tradition, especially a Buddhist tradition, should realise that its own rules and governance model should always take second place to the needs of people seeking liberation from suffering through dharma study and practice, which always requires some safe space for challenging rules and laws which may get in the way of dharma practice, which in its very nature ultimately challenges all normal governance models. Buddha himself found the unregulated wilderness of heavily forested India infinitely preferable as a space for his dharma practice than the highly ordered, hierarchical structures of urban life. And Buddhist history is full of cases where even realised masters were chucked out of their monasteries for breaking rules; Geshe Kelsang Gyatso himself refers to the cases of Shantideva and Mahasiddha Biwawa. This harmonisation of dharma practice with organisational rule is obviously difficult to achieve in practice, but can never be achieved at all if genuine, sincere dissent, questioning and requests for accountability, openness and transparency are denied completely by those in charge of a Buddhist organisation. Time and time again my requests, and those of my colleagues, for explanation, justification, and consultation, have been turned down, leaving me and my colleagues no option but to rebel  and risk being labelled illegal and unconstitutional. Over the coming days I will say more, much more about what has happened and why, but for now I would like to remind readers of what Buddha himself said when he wandered about northern India 2,500 years ago, by quoting from the new book by Vishvapani Blomfield, Gautama Buddha: the life and teachings of the Awakened One :

A particular problem was literalism. Gautama’s insistence that the concepts he used were a means to an end, and therefore not ‘absolute truth’, is one of the most remarkable characteristics of his teaching. He wished each of his disciples to become a liberated arahant who ‘no longer clings to sensual pleasure, views, rules and observances [or] a doctrine of self’, and urged them to hold his teachings lightly and ‘relinquish them easily’. But he commented (perhaps a little wearily) that some of his students knew his teaching very well but failed to achieve realisation because they ‘put the words first’.    pp199-200

It will be exactly  my argument that a drive towards literalism has been part of the reason why some of the recent harmful actions within Maitreya Centre, actions initiated by a ‘head office’ without reference to the actual evidence on the ground locally, have occurred. But more later, when I have time.

 

 

Advertisements

8 Comments on “When a non-virtuous action is legal…”

  1. ben browton says:

    & the Stonewall protests were led by drag queens back in the 1960’s. In India, the hijiras (men-women) are held in common contempt & subjected to humiliation as are the dalits.. I have been in Goa & Kerala where Govt. action tries to prevent child abortion of girls-in-womb. India is a wonderful yet troubling country. Dharma. Depends on what cards life has dealt each individual & how they make the best of their hand. Further reading; The “Sorcerer’s Apprentice”/Tahir Shah. Namaste, Ben

  2. […] When a non-virtuous action is legal… (maitreyabuddhistcentre.wordpress.com) […]

  3. Tenzin says:

    Good luck.

    However, I fear the NKT head office will forcefully sweep away all of “those Maitreya Centre rebels”. It will be a powerful and painful blow. If you and others use the developments well it might lead you to a better situation than you can even imagine at the moment.

    Again, wish you all good luck and a good heart.

  4. Gelugpa says:

    Good luck opposing the oppressors, i expect you will be on the receiving end of their black magic as i was. They even tried to poison me, how ironic that the person who actually poisoned my food is now dead and i am very much alive and kicking! Ha!

  5. begging bowl says:

    I sympathise very deeply with your hardships. You do know that you have angered Shugden as he is completely in keeping with the old curmudgeon King, Geshe la himself. You fight an uphill battle my friend, but keep at it. The NKT will stop at nothing to silence their critics. Bringing the Charities Commission on board is a very wise move. I have seen so much evil done in the name of growing the NKT. Good luck! Many people wish you well!

    • andydharma says:

      Thanks for your words of support. I don’t personally feel that I have ‘angered’ Dorje Shugden, nor do I feel that I am somehow acting against the wishes of Geshe-la in any way. Indeed, I continue to feel I am receiving blessings from both manifestations of Buddha-mind. The fact that the Charities Commission is involved now could be perceived as part of Dorje Shugden’s skilful means in helping all of us deluded beings on either side of the dispute to find a way towards some kind of reconciliation and harmonious resolution. Critics of the NKT can never be silenced anyway; skilful, constructive engagement with them is the only way to turn criticism of the NKT into a positive force for the evolution of the NKT into something that helps Geshe-la’s teachings to be better appreciated by an ever wider audience. The managers of the NKT no doubt have a totally sincere wish to try and promote Geshe-la’s teachings and maintain the purity of them for as long as possible. My only concern, equally sincere, is that this project could be undermined by any attempt to institutionalise a definition of ‘purity’ and an ‘orthodox’ interpretation of the meaning of Geshe-la’s teachings. This could then result in inappropriately using a constitutional and legal framework to defend that definition too agressively by marginalising in a harmful way all those who somehow are perceived as ‘deviating’ from that orthodoxy. The only effective way, long-term, to preserve the purity of Geshe-la’s teachings is through embodying that purity in skilful actions of body, speech and mind, within one’s own practice, thereby showing by good example how Geshe-la’s teachings can transform one’s life for the better. That will attract new disciples and ensure that Geshe-la’s pure intention is preserved. No amount of legal and constitutional rules can create such embodied purity, but they can very often put obstacles in the way. Dorje Shugden, himself, in some of his previous incarnations, had to deal with just such obstacles, as Geshe-la himself explains in his book: Heart Jewel.

  6. website says:

    If you could message me with some hints about how you made this website look this awesome , Id appreciate it!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s